Skip to main content
· 4/18/1994

Black Fire Fighters Ass'n of Dallas v. City of Dallas, Tex.

Citations

  • 19 F.3d 992
  • 28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1302
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8250
  • 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,990
  • 64 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 764

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “de novo review of a [magistrate judge’s 20 report and recommendation] is only required when an objection is made”
  • stating that “de novo review of a [magistrate judge’s 20 report and recommendation] is only required when an objection is made”
  • finding a race-conscious remedial measure unnecessary, in part, because the defendant was a willing party to the settlement of the lawsuit
  • finding a race-conscious remedial measure unnecessary, in part, because the defendant was a willing party to the settlement of the lawsuit
  • “Our aim is not to punish society for the misdeeds of the 20 prosecutor; rather, our goal is to ensure that the petitioner received a fair trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Duhé, Little

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.