Skip to main content
· 6/9/1983

31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1707, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,668 Gloria Holmes v. Continental Can Company

Citations

  • 706 F.2d 1144
  • 36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 817
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26922
  • 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,668
  • 31 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1707

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plan of allocation need not benefit all class members equally
  • stating that “a disparate distribution favoring the named plaintiffs requires careful judicial scrutiny into whether the settlement allocation is fair to the absent members of the class”
  • stating that finding of liability on claims common to class results in equitable relief
  • holding notice of opportunity to opt-out of settlement was required in 23(b)(2
  • finding an award of back pay to be a remedy within the ambit of Rule 23(b)(2)
  • stating that a district court must provide an explanation for its decision such that an appeals 8 USCA11 Case: 20-11743 Date Filed: 07/01/2021 Page: 9 of 15 court has a “basis for judging the exercise of the district judge’s discretion.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Vance, Tuttle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.