Laube v. Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a motion to intervene on the ground that the stated interest depended “on the occurrence of a long sequence of events before it could become colorable.”
• “Interests that are contingent upon some future events and which are purely a matter of speculation are not the kind of protectable interest necessary to support intervention as of right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Estep
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2007-09-25· cited 21×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
  Supreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 8,956×
• Diamond v. Charles
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 1,118×
• Lawton Chiles, Jr., Bob Martinez, Metropolitan Dade County, Intervenors-Appellants v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United States
  Eleventh Circuit· 1989-02-16· cited 217×
• Purcell v. BankAtlantic Financial Corp.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1996-06-25· cited 90×
• Howard v. McLucas
  Eleventh Circuit· 1986-02-20· cited 44×
• Manasota-88, Inc. v. Tidwell
  Eleventh Circuit· 1990-03-22· cited 31×
• Laube v. Haley
  M.D. Alabama· 2002-12-02· cited 19×
• Standard Heating And Air Conditioning Co. v. City Of Minneapolis
  Eighth Circuit· 1998-02-25· cited 5×
• Acceptance Indemnity Insurance v. Southeastern Forge, Inc.
  M.D. Georgia· 2002-10-03· cited 5×