Skip to main content
· 12/20/2011

Howard v. Cumberland River Coal Co.

Citations

  • 838 F. Supp. 2d 577
  • 2011 WL 6372777
  • 192 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2845
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146080

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying New York’s common law “rule that gives a remedy in cases of substantial performance with compensation for defects of trivial or inappreciable importance has been developed by the courts as an instrument of justice,” Jacob & Youngs v. Kent, 230 N.Y. 239, 245 (1921)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thapar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.