Brown v. Cassens Transport Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that thirteen predicate acts that span over three years constitute a period of closed-ended continuity, especially when alleging that the legitimate business, or part, is conducted regularly by way of fraud through the use of fraudulent communications by mail and wire
• applying Bridge and concluding that the plaintiffs pled proximate cause because “the defendants’ fraudulent acts were a ‘substantial and foreseeable cause’ of the injuries”
• describing the fact the employer was self-insured as crucial to the application of the Pireno test
• “[A] federal court should typically decline to exercise pendent jurisdiction over a plaintiff's state-law claims after dismissing the plaintiff’s federal claims.”
• “[A] federal court should typically decline to exercise pendent jurisdiction over a plaintiff's state-law claims after dismissing the plaintiff’s federal claims.”
• “[A] federal court should typically decline to exercise pendent jurisdiction over a plaintiff’s state-law claims after dismissing the plaintiff’s federal claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).