Skip to main content
· 1/6/2004

James Mattis v. David Massman and General Motors Corporation

Citations

  • 355 F.3d 902
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 68
  • 173 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2997
  • 2004 WL 26407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[D]e-termining whether [the] alleged harassment constituted `outrageous conduct' would force [the Court] to look to the CBA.\
  • state law claims are preempted by the LMRA when the claims are “inextricably intertwined” with terms of the labor contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Nelson, Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.