Supreme Court· 4/23/1945
Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt
Citations
- 324 U.S. 652
- 65 S. Ct. 870
- 89 L. Ed. 1252
- 1945 U.S. LEXIS 2629
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that during the intermediary period between the establishment of the Commonwealth of the Philippine Islands and the final withdrawal of United States sovereignty from those islands “Congress retains plenary power over the territorial government”
- recognizing that, during the intermediary period between the establishment of the Commonwealth of the Philippine Islands and the final withdrawal of United States sovereignty from those islands, “Con- gress retains plenary power over the territorial government”
- stating that the Philippines were “...territories belonging to, but not a part of the Union of states under the Constitution ... ”
- explaining that the Philippine Islands were then “territories belonging to, but not a part of, the Union of states under the Constitution”
- stating that interpretation of the Export Clause was not necessary for the Dooley decision
- holding articles brought from the Philippine Islands into the United States were imports immune from state taxation under the Import-Export Clause, because the Philippines were not part of the United States in constitutional sense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bl-Ack, Douglas, Murphy, Reed, Rutledge, Stone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
136 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-12-12· cited 2,107×
- Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court· 1947-03-10· cited 1,823×
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,335×
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-03-03· cited 855×
- Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 831×
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 536×
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 536×
- Pennekamp v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1946-06-03· cited 529×
- Dennis v. HigginsSupreme Court· 1991-02-20· cited 452×
- Osborn v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 418×
- Prudential Insurance v. BenjaminSupreme Court· 1946-06-03· cited 408×
- Kleppe v. New MexicoSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 342×
- Feiner v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1951-01-15· cited 318×
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court· 1946-11-25· cited 201×
- Michelin Tire Corp. v. WagesSupreme Court· 1976-01-14· cited 188×
- Barber v. GonzalesSupreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 178×
- 324 Liquor Corp. v. DuffySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 157×
- United States v. James Cabaccang, United States of America v. Richard T. Cabaccang, United States of America v. Roy Toves CabaccangNinth Circuit· 2003-06-06· cited 132×
- Vermilya-Brown Co. v. ConnellSupreme Court· 1948-12-06· cited 129×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1827-03-12· cited 822×
- Norris v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1935-04-01· cited 711×
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court· 1921-12-19· cited 592×
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court· 1935-03-04· cited 581×
- Downes v. BidwellSupreme Court· 1901-05-27· cited 463×
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1847-03-18· cited 427×
- Balzac v. Porto RicoSupreme Court· 1922-04-10· cited 387×
- Brown v. HoustonSupreme Court· 1885-05-04· cited 286×
- Dorr v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1904-05-31· cited 258×
- Fiske v. KansasSupreme Court· 1927-05-16· cited 221×
- Dowdell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1911-05-15· cited 189×
- Dooley v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1901-05-27· cited 186×
- Sonneborn Brothers v. CuretonSupreme Court· 1923-06-11· cited 172×
- American Steel & Wire Co. v. SpeedSupreme Court· 1904-02-23· cited 168×
- Cincinnati Soap Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1937-05-03· cited 144×
- Patapsco Guano Co. v. North Carolina Board of AgricultureSupreme Court· 1898-05-31· cited 138×
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. C. H. Albers Commission Co.Supreme Court· 1912-02-26· cited 131×
- Ocampo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1914-05-25· cited 127×
- First National Bank of Hartford v. City of HartfordSupreme Court· 1927-03-21· cited 123×
- Cook v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1878-11-18· cited 114×
Other cases named Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.