Supreme Court· 1/14/1976
Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages
Citations
- 423 U.S. 276
- 96 S. Ct. 535
- 46 L. Ed. 2d 495
- 1976 U.S. LEXIS 120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that nondiscriminatory ad valorem taxation “deprives the Federal Government of nothing to which it is entitled”
- noting that “[w]hat we do in this case is to merely ‘draw a line,’ and it is, admittedly, a difficult line to draw”
- noting that “nondiscriminatory ad valorem” and other types of taxes share “the characteristic that they cannot be selectively imposed and increased so as substantially to impair or prohibit importation”
- noting that “nondiscriminatory ad valorem” and other types of taxes share “the characteristic that they cannot be selectively imposed and increased so as substantially to impair or prohibit importation”
- overruling Low v. Austin, 13 Wall. 29 (1872), because it ignored the language and objectives of the Import-Export Clause and misread earlier Court precedent
- describing reasons behind and analysis of Import-Export Clause to determine whether a tax constitutes an impermissible impost or duty
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brennan, Btjrger, Stewart, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, White, Stevens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
135 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 3,458×
- Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 779×
- Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court· 1980-08-11· cited 702×
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 579×
- Webster v. Reproductive Health ServicesSupreme Court· 1989-07-03· cited 490×
- Wardair Canada Inc. v. Florida Department of RevenueSupreme Court· 1986-06-18· cited 458×
- Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of HarrisonSupreme Court· 1997-05-19· cited 392×
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 384×
- Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 375×
- South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. WunnickeSupreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 373×
- Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 289×
- United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court· 1982-03-24· cited 272×
- Department of Revenue v. Ass'n of Washington Stevedoring CompaniesSupreme Court· 1978-04-26· cited 207×
- Ramah Navajo School Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NMSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 179×
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. HyattSupreme Court· 2019-05-13· cited 166×
- R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Durham CountySupreme Court· 1986-12-09· cited 165×
- United States v. International Business MacHines Corp.Supreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 153×
- ESAB Group, Incorporated v. Zurich Insurance PLCFourth Circuit· 2012-07-09· cited 152×
- Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal.Supreme Court· 1994-06-20· cited 135×
- Polar Tankers, Inc. v. City of Valdez, AlaskaSupreme Court· 2009-06-15· cited 101×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1827-03-12· cited 822×
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1847-03-18· cited 427×
- Hooven & Allison Co. v. EvattSupreme Court· 1945-04-23· cited 189×
- Cook v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1878-11-18· cited 114×
- May v. New OrleansSupreme Court· 1900-05-28· cited 99×
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. BowersSupreme Court· 1959-02-24· cited 75×
- Wages v. Michelin Tire CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia· 1975-02-04· cited 9×
- City of Galveston v. Mexican Petroleum CorporationS.D. Texas· 1926-06-15· cited 6×
Other cases named Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.