Supreme Court· 3/12/1827
Brown v. Maryland
Citations
- 25 U.S. 419
- 6 L. Ed. 678
- 12 Wheat. 419
- 1827 U.S. LEXIS 398
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the foreign- commerce power is in “the control” of “a single [federal] government”
- reading Import- Export Clause to prohibit state laws imposing duties on “importations from a sister State”
- reasoning that “the taxing power of the States must have some limits” and that “[i]t cannot reach and restrain the action of the national government within its proper sphere” or “restrain the operation of any law which Congress may constitutionally pass”
- noting presumption of constitutionality favors every legislative act and burden of proof rests on person denying act’s constitutionality
- reasoning that “the taxing power of the States must have some limits” and that “[i]t cannot reach and restrain the action of the national government within its proper sphere” or “restrain the operation of any law which Congress may constitutionally pass”
- reading Import- Export Clause to prohibit state laws imposing duties on “importations from a sister State”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, Marshall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
509 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1969-04-21· cited 3,119×
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 3,052×
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court· 1920-03-08· cited 1,262×
- Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 1,248×
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court· 1944-06-05· cited 861×
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court· 1992-05-26· cited 685×
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court· 1919-04-16· cited 608×
- Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1895-04-08· cited 605×
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court· 1935-03-04· cited 581×
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court· 1887-03-07· cited 570×
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court· 1937-12-06· cited 542×
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 536×
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1914-06-08· cited 515×
- St. John Dixon v. Alabama State Board of EducationFifth Circuit· 1961-08-04· cited 487×
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1847-03-18· cited 427×
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court· 1938-02-14· cited 424×
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1995-04-03· cited 415×
- Prudential Insurance v. BenjaminSupreme Court· 1946-06-03· cited 408×
- Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1878-05-13· cited 406×
- Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of HarrisonSupreme Court· 1997-05-19· cited 392×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Brown v. Maryland
17 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-04-01· cited 3×
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1980-10-06· cited 3×
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 2003-06-02
- Brown v. MarylandFourth Circuit· 2010-01-22
- Brown v. MarylandFourth Circuit· 2010-01-22
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1956-12-03
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1961-02-20
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1965-01-18
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1970-01-12
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1980-10-06
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1981-06-15
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1986-05-19
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1987-02-23
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1988-10-03
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1988-10-03
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 2003-06-02
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 2003-06-02
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.