California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that California lacked the power to sanction horizontal price fixing for wine sold within its borders
• deciding that California lacked the power to sanction horizontal price fixing for wine sold within its borders
• holding that where the statute expressly required members of the wine industry to set price schedules for wine sales it amounted to a per se Sherman Act violation
• holding that where the statute expressly required members of the wine industry to set price schedules for wine sales it amounted to a per se Sherman Act violation
• holding that State’s interest in promoting temperance through statute was not substantial and was therefore clearly outweighed by the important federal objectives of the Sherman Act
• holding that the challenged practice violated the Sherman Act but continuing to examine it under Parker

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).