Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Dormant Commerce Clause prohibits one state from “establish[ing] . . . a scale of prices for use in other states”
• holding that the Dormant Commerce Clause prohibits one state from \establish[ing] ... a scale of prices for use in other states\
• holding that one state “has no power to project its legislation into [another state] by regulating the price to be paid in that state for [products] acquired there”
• declaring that \one state in its dealings with another may not place itself in a position of economic isolation\
• cautioning that its invalidation of a price-affirmation law did not undermine the validity of other consumer protection laws
• declaring that “one state in its dealings with another may not place itself in a position of economic isolation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).