Skip to main content

Holt v. State

Citations

  • 435 Md. 443
  • 78 A.3d 415
  • 2013 WL 5779644
  • 2013 Md. LEXIS 827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “we . . . owe the [suppression] court’s legal determination no deference; rather, we must perform our own appraisal of whether there existed reasonable suspicion[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera, Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.