Skip to main content

Washington v. State

Citations

  • 482 Md. 395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “unprovoked flight in a high- crime area does not automatically equal reasonable articulable suspicion for a Terry stop[,]” but could be used as a “factor justifying a conclusion that criminal activity is afoot”
  • describing a decision by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals that an officer’s testimony regarding a “high-crime area” “did not add much value to the analysis” because, among other things, “there was no testimony with respect to the area’s boundaries” (citation modified)
  • “[T]he protections under Article 26 are coextensive with those under the Fourth Amendment.”
  • unprovoked, headlong flight “may allow an inference of suspicion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.