In Re American Optical Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a discovery order was overly broad by requiring production of “virtually all documents regarding its products for a fifty-year period”
• holding that discovery requests must be reasonably tailored to include only matters relevant to the case
• concluding that discovery order was overly broad by requiring production of “virtually all documents regarding its products for a 50-year period”
• holding that discovery order that included all respiratory products manufactured by defendant was too broad because it included respiratory equipment plaintiffs never alleged they used
• holding that trial court's ruling to produce every document relating to asbestos for a fifty-year period was impermissibly broad
• holding that an order requiring the defendant to produce all documents it created in a fifty-year period relating to asbestos was overbroad as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).