Skip to main content

Hines v. State

Citations

  • 3 S.W.3d 618
  • 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 6514
  • 1999 WL 669210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a rule approved by the supreme court and court of criminal appeals is constitutional until one of them holds otherwise
  • holding that a rule approved by the supreme court and court of criminal appeals is constitutional until one of them holds otherwise
  • holding that rule 606(b) is not in conflict with appellate rule 21.3
  • holding that rule 606(b) is not in conflict with appellate rule 21.3
  • holding the jurors’ discussion of parole law during deliberations did not amount to outside influence
  • holding jurors’ discussion of parole law during deliberations did not amount to outside influence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cornelius, Grant, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

85 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.