Skip to main content

Ford v. State

Citations

  • 129 S.W.3d 541
  • 2003 WL 176355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that A where there is conflicting evidence on an issue of fact as to jury misconduct, the trial judge determines the issue @
  • applying abuse of discretion during appellate review of denial of new trial based on allegedly withheld voir dire information
  • “[T]he information was not ‘material’ because it was not of the type ‘suggesting potential for bias or prejudice.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moseley, Lang, Lagarde

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.