Skip to main content

Sneed v. State

Citations

  • 670 S.W.2d 262
  • 1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 658

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • issues of fact as to jury misconduct raised at a hearing on a motion for new trial are for the determination of the trial judge
  • issues of fact as to jury misconduct raised at a hearing on a motion for new trial are for the determination of the trial judge
  • \[I]t is common knowledge that from time to time inmates of the Texas Department of Corrections are released on parole....\
  • “[I]t is common knowledge that from time to time inmates of the Texas Department of Corrections are released on parole_”
  • “[W]here there is conflicting evidence[,] there is no abuse of discretion where the motion for new trial is overruled.”
  • “[I]ssues of fact as to jury misconduct raised at a hearing on [a] motion for new trial are for the determination of the trial judge, and where there is conflicting evidence there is no abuse of discretion where the motion for new trial is overruled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion, Odom, Clinton, Teague, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

136 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Sneed v. State

87 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.