Skip to main content

White v. State

Citations

  • 225 S.W.3d 571
  • 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 693
  • 2007 WL 1610442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the mere presence of two absolutely disqualified jurors did not demonstrate significant harm under article 44.46
  • holding mere presence of two absolutely disqualified jurors did not demonstrate significant harm
  • explaining that when a defendant discovers that a juror was not qualified to serve after the entry of verdict, \[a] duty on the defendant arises in an appeal to make a showing of significant harm\
  • explaining that when a defendant discovers that a juror was not qualified to serve after the entry of verdict, \[a] duty on the defendant arises in an appeal to make a showing of significant harm\
  • considering whether defense counsel “used due diligence in eliciting the withheld information omitted by the juror or jurors during voir dire”
  • setting out three grounds for jury misconduct that can potentially get a defendant a new trial: 1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Keller, Meyers, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.