Skip to main content

Hicks v. State

Citations

  • 15 S.W.3d 626
  • 2000 WL 350527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding COVID-19 cannot justify a denial of the right to a speedy trial because “a state of disaster alone cannot indefinitely pretermit enjoyment of the right”
  • recognizing no due process concern with rule 606(b)’s general prohibition against jurors testifying as to matters and statements occurring during deliberations, and upholding trial court’s refusal to admit juror’s affidavit, in case of potential jury misconduct
  • explaining that while amended rule 606(b
  • “The 1998 version of Rule 606(b) apparently wipes out Buentello, and all of its progeny”
  • Rule 606(b) did not violate appellant = s right to effective assistance of counsel and has been held constitutional under both state and federal constitutions guaranteeing a fair and impartial jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joe L. Draughn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.