Skip to main content
· 7/29/2005

Robert Madrid Salazar v. Doug Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Citations

  • 419 F.3d 384
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15610
  • 2005 WL 1797079

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a federal circuit court decision, “even if compelling and well- reasoned, cannot satisfy the clearly established federal law requirement under § 2254(d)(1)”
  • construing Texas Rule 606(b) in conjunction with federal law and precedent, no Supreme Court precedent obligates state courts to admit testimony from jurors concerning their internal deliberations
  • “[A] decision by this court or one of our sister circuits, even if compelling and well-reasoned, cannot satisfy the clearly established federal law requirement under § 2254(d)(1).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Demoss, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.