Amy L. Falatovics v. Imre L. Falatovics

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exclusion of Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 19A-DN-858 | November 27, 2019 Page 7 of 14 Husband’s interest in real property conveyed to him by his parents during the marriage was reversible error
• remanding for redistribution of marital estate after inclusion of previously- excluded marital assets
• “The parties agreed that the value of Husband’s interest in Parcels 1 and 2 was $106,700.”
• “The systematic exclusion of any marital asset from the marital pot is erroneous.”
• citing, inter alia, Ind. Code § 31-15-7-4(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).