Perkins v. Harding

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding debt that was incurred jointly and acquired before the date of separation is included in the marital pot
• “Indiana subscribes to the ‘one-pot’ theory of 1 Anne’s reliance on Myers v. Myers, 560 N.E.2d 39 (Ind. 1990
• “We are confident the court attempted to divide the marital estate equally between the parties, and it did the best it could in light of the dearth of evidence regarding the value of some of the larger assets in the estate.”
• “[A]ny party who fails to introduce evidence as to the specific value of the marital property at the dissolution hearing is estopped from appealing the distribution on the ground of trial court abuse of discretion based on that absence of evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).