Skip to main content
· 5/31/1996

Hatten v. Hatten

Citations

  • 917 P.2d 667
  • 1996 Alas. LEXIS 57
  • 1996 WL 285412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e conclude under Bandow that the designation or structuring of damages in a settlement agreement does not control whether the proceeds are separate or marital property.”
  • “[I]f the formal structuring of settlement proceeds subsequently controlled their classification as either marital or separate property, then the ‘analytic’ approach [under Bandow] would be meaningless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Matthews, Compton, Eastaugh, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.