· 5/31/1996
Hatten v. Hatten
Citations
- 917 P.2d 667
- 1996 Alas. LEXIS 57
- 1996 WL 285412
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e conclude under Bandow that the designation or structuring of damages in a settlement agreement does not control whether the proceeds are separate or marital property.”
- “[I]f the formal structuring of settlement proceeds subsequently controlled their classification as either marital or separate property, then the ‘analytic’ approach [under Bandow] would be meaningless.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rabinowitz, Matthews, Compton, Eastaugh, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.