Court of Appeals of Virginia· 4/4/1989
Hill v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 379 S.E.2d 134
- 8 Va. App. 60
- 5 Va. Law Rep. 2121
- 1989 Va. App. LEXIS 21
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing users to testify about the identity of drugs “after previous use has been demonstrated”
- allowing users to testify about the identity of drugs “after previous use has been demonstrated”
- listing “the physical appearance of the substance involved,” “evidence that the substance produced the expected effects,” and “evidence that the substance was called by the name of the [substance] by the defendant” among the types of circumstantial evidence that may be considered
- “Users and addicts, if they have gained familiarity or experience with a drug, may identify it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cole, Barrow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-05-25· cited 172×
- Myrick v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-11-26· cited 49×
- Goldhamer v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-03-07· cited 37×
- Dunaway v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-07-15· cited 21×
- Merritt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2011-01-25· cited 10×
- Floyd v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-12-21· cited 10×
- Hinton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-09-08· cited 8×
- Hassan Bah v. William BarrFourth Circuit· 2020-02-13· cited 8×
- Mackall v. MurrayFourth Circuit· 1997-03-25· cited 8×
- O’Dell v. Thompson, Warden, Et Al.Supreme Court· 1991-12-02· cited 7×
- Blevins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-12-18· cited 2×
- Garrett v. AngeloneSpotsylvania County Circuit Court· 1997-09-08· cited 2×
- Lenny Rock Kenner v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2019-12-03
- Priscilla Ann Holmes v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2022-11-22
- Commonwealth v. HensleyVirginia Circuit Court· 2003-01-28
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1978-04-03· cited 2,478×
- Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1975-10-10· cited 746×
- Slayton v. ParriganSupreme Court of Virginia· 1974-06-10· cited 378×
- Frye v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1986-06-13· cited 272×
- People v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-02-07· cited 242×
- Gray v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1987-04-24· cited 185×
- Evans-Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-10-20· cited 166×
- Tafero v. DuggerSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 150×
- Commission v. LysyjSupreme Court· 1975-01-13· cited 142×
- United States v. Chan Walker Zielie, Keith H. Gustafson, Thomas David Wilkerson, Robert Walter Govern, and Leon D. MausserEleventh Circuit· 1984-06-25· cited 132×
- Correll v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1987-01-16· cited 132×
- United States v. Dwayne DolanFourth Circuit· 1976-11-11· cited 129×
- Justus v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1981-10-16· cited 118×
- United States v. Kevin Sweeney, Daniel Hughes and Robert Ellington, and United States of America v. Daniel M. HughesSeventh Circuit· 1982-09-15· cited 116×
- United States v. Paul F. GregorioFourth Circuit· 1974-05-31· cited 100×
- Payne v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1987-06-12· cited 87×
- Beaver v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1987-01-16· cited 62×
- United States v. Patricia AtkinsEighth Circuit· 1973-02-21· cited 61×
- Washington v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1975-09-05· cited 59×
- Walker v. MitchellSupreme Court of Virginia· 1983-01-21· cited 55×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.