Skip to main content

Hill v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 379 S.E.2d 134
  • 8 Va. App. 60
  • 5 Va. Law Rep. 2121
  • 1989 Va. App. LEXIS 21

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing users to testify about the identity of drugs “after previous use has been demonstrated”
  • allowing users to testify about the identity of drugs “after previous use has been demonstrated”
  • listing “the physical appearance of the substance involved,” “evidence that the substance produced the expected effects,” and “evidence that the substance was called by the name of the [substance] by the defendant” among the types of circumstantial evidence that may be considered
  • “Users and addicts, if they have gained familiarity or experience with a drug, may identify it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole, Barrow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.