Floyd v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The in-court identification of Floyd as one of the two perpetrators is sufficient direct evidence to establish his identity.”
• interpreting bodily injury under Code § 18.2-52

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Corado v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-12-28· cited 24×
• Dunaway v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-07-15· cited 21×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cheng v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1990-06-08· cited 243×
• People v. Hicks
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-04-04· cited 129×
• Bishop v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1984-03-09· cited 118×
• George v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1991-11-08· cited 115×
• Woolfolk v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-08-23· cited 110×
• Cameron v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1970-06-15· cited 50×
• Hill v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-04-04· cited 31×
• Smith v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-09-07· cited 20×
• Brown v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-07-27· cited 9×