· 6/13/1986
Frye v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 345 S.E.2d 267
- 231 Va. 370
- 1986 Va. LEXIS 204
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court is under no du(y to offer a remedy for which the defendant has not asked
- holding that the defendant’s “presence and subsequent flight, without more, were insufficient to make him a principal in the second degree”
- holding that the proper response to a late Brady disclosure was a motion for continuance, not a motion to dismiss
- holding that ex parte order did not prejudice defendant because its entry was not required and it had no legal effect
- holding that an NCIC report is admissible if the evidence “shows the regularity of the preparation of the records and reliance on them by their preparers or those for whom they are prepared”
- ruling that the National Criminal Information Center report comes within the hearsay exception
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cochran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.