Evans-Smith v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial judge erred by not questioning the jury about its consideration of extraneous information
• stating that the general rule for the admissibility of evidence is that it be relevant and material
• finding that the trial court correctly excluded witness’ statement as inadmissible opinion
• \The admissibility of evidence is a matter of law to be determined by the trial judge.\
• “Evidence is material if it relates to a matter properly at issue.”
• \Evidence is material if it relates to a matter properly at issue.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).