Slayton v. Parrigan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that issues not properly raised on direct appeal will not be considered on state collateral review
• holding that issues not properly raised on direct appeal will not be considered on state collateral review
• holding that claims that could have been raised on direct appeal, but were not, cannot be raised on state collateral review
• holding that issues not properly raised on direct appeal will not be considered on state collateral review
• holding that issues not properly raised at trial or on direct appeal will not be considered in habeas
• holding that issues not properly raised at trial and on direct appeal will not be considered on state collateral postconviction review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).