People v. Rolandis G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the victim's statements to his mother were properly admitted under section 115-10 and did not raise any confrontation-clause issues
• seven-year-old made the same statement to his mother, a police detective, and a child abuse investigator, but only the statement to his mother was nontestimonial
• seven-year-old made the same statement to his mother, a police detective, and a child abuse investigator, but only the statement to his mother was nontestimonial
• statements to private child abuse investigator while police officer watched through one-way glass were testimonial
• victim’s statements to police on the day of the alleged assault, and to a child advocacy worker a week later, were testimonial, being the result of “formal and systematic questioning”
• victim's statements to police on the day of the alleged assault, and to a child advocacy worker a week later, were testimonial, being the result of \formal and systematic questioning\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).