Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Arizona· 11/4/2014

State v. Hill

Citations

  • 236 Ariz. 162
  • 336 P.3d 1283
  • 699 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 4
  • 2014 Ariz. App. LEXIS 212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding similar circumstances, “objectively viewed together, demonstrate that the primary purpose of the exchange that produced the statement at issue was to provide medical treatment”
  • noting that statements “are testimonial when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no such ongoing emergency, and that the primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution”
  • “Other courts examining similar exchanges under the Confrontation Clause have looked to where the examination took place, the victim’s medical condition, (continued . . .
  • “We cannot say *** that a statement made in response to a question by a medical provider in connection with non-emergent medical -8- 2016 IL App (2d
  • “If the primary purpose of the encounter is the provision and receipt of medical care, the statement is non-testimonial, regardless of whether the care sought is for an emergent condition.”
  • “Because the 10 victim’s statement to the forensic nurse was not testimonial, [Petitioner’s] rights under the 11 Confrontation Clause were not violated when the superior court allowed the nurse to 12 recount the statement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnsen, Swann, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.