Skip to main content

Henson v. State

Citations

  • 173 S.W.3d 92
  • 2005 WL 1243355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding fundamental error not established where veniremembers, later empaneled without objection, responded in voir dire that they would err on the side of the State if a vote was taken during voir dire
  • concluding evidence was sufficient to support conviction of attempted indecency with a child
  • providing elements for attempted indecency with a child and that “[e]ireumstantial evidence may be used to prove an essential element of the offense charged.”
  • referring to an “imaginary line” separating non-criminal mere preparatory conduct from criminal conduct that tends to effect the commission of an offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Worthen, Griffith, Devasto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.