Penagraph v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding jury exclusive judge of credibility of witnesses and may reject any or all of any witnesses’ testimony
• opining that “a jury is entitled to accept one version of the facts and reject another or reject any of a witness’s testimony”
• opining that “a jury is entitled to accept one version of the facts and reject another or reject any of a witness’s testimony”
• opining that “a jury is entitled to accept one version of the facts and reject another or reject any of a witness’s testimony”
• opining that “a jury is entitled to accept one version of the facts and reject another or reject any of a witness’s testimony”
• stating that “a jury is entitled to accept one version of the facts and reject another or reject any of a witness’s testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).