E.D. Virginia· 2/3/1981
Haynes v. Anderson & Strudwick, Inc.
Citations
- 508 F. Supp. 1303
- 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10604
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- private cause of action held to exist under Rule 1 Ob-16
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warriner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Robert S. Robertson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1984-12-10· cited 556×
- Kay Hollinger Richard Llewelyn Jones Edward E. Nissen Judy D'Arcy K-Judy, Ltd. v. Titan Capital Corp. Emil Wilkowski Painter Financial Group, Ltd.Ninth Circuit· 1990-11-13· cited 344×
- In Re MicroStrategy, Inc. Securities LitigationE.D. Virginia· 2000-09-15· cited 146×
- Angelastro v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.Third Circuit· 1985-06-12· cited 107×
- Jaksich v. Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.S.D. New York· 1984-02-10· cited 40×
- Feld & Sons, Inc. v. Pechner, Dorfman, Wolfee, Rounick, & CabotSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-30· cited 40×
- Gurley v. Documation Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1982-03-22· cited 31×
- Slomiak v. Bear Stearns & Co.S.D. New York· 1984-07-24· cited 28×
- Metge v. BaehlerS.D. Iowa· 1984-01-09· cited 24×
- Frankel v. Wyllie & Thornhill, Inc.W.D. Virginia· 1982-04-15· cited 23×
- In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities LitigationC.D. California· 1987-09-25· cited 22×
- Kravetz v. BrukenfeldS.D. New York· 1984-08-06· cited 22×
- Pross v. Baird Patrick & Co., Inc.S.D. New York· 1984-02-08· cited 19×
- Kirkland v. EF Hutton and Co., Inc.E.D. Michigan· 1983-03-04· cited 18×
- Baker v. Wheat First SecuritiesS.D. West Virginia· 1986-09-08· cited 16×
- Walker v. Cardinal Savings & Loan Ass'nE.D. Virginia· 1988-07-19· cited 10×
- Davis v. ColeE.D. Virginia· 1998-03-20· cited 9×
- Steinberg v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.D. Delaware· 1982-08-24· cited 7×
- Baden v. Craig-Hallum, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1986-10-23· cited 6×
- Castleglen, Inc. v. Commonwealth Savings Ass'nD. Utah· 1988-06-24· cited 6×
Cites
72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court· 1975-06-17· cited 3,337×
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 2,763×
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 2,261×
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 1,881×
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court· 1979-11-13· cited 1,476×
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 1,399×
- Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court· 1971-11-08· cited 948×
- Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Second Circuit· 1952-01-10· cited 575×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,959 Frank Lanza, Jr. v. Drexel & Co., Theodore J. Kircher and Christie F. VitoloSecond Circuit· 1973-04-26· cited 381×
- Myzel v. FieldsEighth Circuit· 1967-10-12· cited 377×
- Joslyn v. JoslynSupreme Court· 1968-03-04· cited 270×
- Rochez Brothers, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Charles R. RhoadesThird Circuit· 1975-09-29· cited 234×
- Richard Shemtob v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., Inc.Second Circuit· 1971-08-31· cited 218×
- The Johns Hopkins University v. William E. HuttonFourth Circuit· 1970-02-18· cited 213×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,437 Hetty Fey v. Walston & Co., Inc., and Robert A. SpiraSeventh Circuit· 1974-03-14· cited 205×
- Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, AndNinth Circuit· 1970-09-04· cited 185×
- Zweig v. Hearst Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1975-07-21· cited 149×
- Helen C. Carras and Bill G. Carras, Co-Executors of the Estate of Gus N. Carras, Deceased v. James S. Burns, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 1975-05-06· cited 127×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.