Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 6/12/1985

Angelastro v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.

Citations

  • 764 F.2d 939
  • 54 U.S.L.W. 2007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that customers maintain brokerage accounts “for the very purpose of trading in securities”
  • noting that customers maintain brokerage accounts “for the very purpose of trading in securities”
  • plaintiff must establish some causal connection between alleged misrepresentation and harm incurred when a security is purchased or sold
  • there must be some causal connection between alleged fraud and purchase or sale of securities; injury suffered must result from the deceptive practices touching the purchase or sale of securities
  • while Rule 10b-5 claims typically involve alleged misrepresentations regarding the merits of a particular security, the rule also encompasses misrepresentations beyond those implicating the investment value of a security; citing Bankers Life for proposition that § 10(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named Angelastro v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.