J. I. Case Co. v. Borak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a right of action [under § 14(a)] exists as to both derivative and direct causes”
• holding that “it is the duty of the courts to be alert to provide such remedies as are necessary to make effective the congressional purpose” of a federal statute
• holding that \it is the duty of the courts to be alert to provide such remedies as are necessary to make effective the congressional purpose\ of a federal statute
• noting that Section 14(a) was designed to \prevent management or others from obtaining authorization for corporate action by means of deceptive or inadequate disclosure in proxy solicitation\
• stating that “purpose of § 14(a) is to prevent management or others from obtaining authorization for corporate action by means of deceptive or inadequate disclosure in proxy solicitation.” (emphasis added)
• noting that Section 14(a) was designed to “prevent management or others from obtaining authorization for corporate action by means of deceptive or inadequate disclosure in proxy solicitation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).