The Johns Hopkins University v. William E. Hutton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the question of plaintiff's diligence in uncovering fraud is for the jury where the facts give rise to conflicting inferences
• the question of plaintiff’s diligence in uncovering fraud is for the jury where the facts give rise to conflicting inferences
• under 12(2), a fact is material if a reasonable investor would have attached importance to it
• under Sec. 12(2), a fact is material if a reasonable investor would have attached importance to it
• application of vicarious liability principles limited to cases where purpose of securities laws served
• respondeat superior not supplanted by § 15

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).