Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 3/22/1982

Gurley v. Documation Inc.

Citations

  • 674 F.2d 253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that those who owned shares and delayed their sale based in part on misinformation lacked standing under 10(b)
  • prohibiting “deferred sales claims [because they] pose the same risk of abuse as the pure retention claims which are barred by Blue Chip”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.