Supreme Court of Florida· 10/5/1995
Gibson v. State
Citations
- 661 So. 2d 288
- 1995 WL 582212
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying claim that defendant's right to be present at bench conferences at which challenges for cause were made by his counsel had been violated and noting, in apparent dicta, that \no objection to the court's procedure was ever made\
- “Our evidence code liberally permits the introduction of evidence to show the bias or motive of a witness [in testifying].”
- “Our evidence code liberally permits the introduction of evidence to show the bias or motive of a witness.”
- \Inherent within this right is a defendant's right to expose a witness's motivation in testifying because it is `the principal means by which the believability of a witness and the truth of his testimony are tested.'\
- “We further recognize that a defendant’s right to cross- examine witnesses is secured by the Sixth Amendment to the United States 1 In Florida, a criminal defendant’s right to cross-examine witnesses is also secured by Article 1, Section 16(a
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Morrison v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-03-21· cited 104×
- Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-03· cited 93×
- Donaldson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-04-30· cited 88×
- Tanzi v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-05-10· cited 65×
- Murray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-03· cited 27×
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-09-25· cited 24×
- Carmichael v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-07-09· cited 20×
- Fluellen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-23· cited 18×
- Mejia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-13· cited 16×
- State v. MejiaSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-06-26· cited 15×
- Purcell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-23· cited 13×
- Brower v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-11· cited 13×
- Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-21· cited 12×
- Solis v. CalvoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-19· cited 12×
- Asay v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-06-13· cited 8×
- Roosevelt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-04· cited 8×
- Rowley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-18· cited 7×
- Shaw v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-04· cited 7×
- Holley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-17· cited 7×
- Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-27· cited 6×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- Steinhorst v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-03-04· cited 391×
- Danial Siebert v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1990-06-28· cited 310×
- Grossman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-18· cited 151×
- Coney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-05· cited 135×
- Drake v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-05-21· cited 107×
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-06-22· cited 70×
- Bouie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-04-05· cited 48×
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-08-31· cited 43×
- Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-12· cited 33×
- Christopher v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-05-30· cited 29×
- Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-04-02· cited 25×
- Layman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-03-23· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.