Skip to main content

Andrews v. State

Citations

  • 533 So. 2d 841
  • 1988 WL 107896

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an admission standard based upon relevancy is preferable to the Frye general acceptance approach \which is predicated on a `nose counting.'\
  • Dr. Baird's population frequency calculations found to be reliable and generally accepted in the relevant scientific community
  • double jeopardy does not prohibit multiple convictions for “discrete acts committed during one transaction.”
  • affirming admission of DNA evidence under relevancy approach
  • affirming admission of DNA evidence under relevancy approach
  • \Neither Frye nor our evidence code require [expert's] impartiality.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orfinger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.