District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/20/1988
Andrews v. State
Citations
- 533 So. 2d 841
- 1988 WL 107896
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an admission standard based upon relevancy is preferable to the Frye general acceptance approach \which is predicated on a `nose counting.'\
- Dr. Baird's population frequency calculations found to be reliable and generally accepted in the relevant scientific community
- double jeopardy does not prohibit multiple convictions for “discrete acts committed during one transaction.”
- affirming admission of DNA evidence under relevancy approach
- affirming admission of DNA evidence under relevancy approach
- \Neither Frye nor our evidence code require [expert's] impartiality.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orfinger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- Roberson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-04-13· cited 277×
- State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-11-03· cited 141×
- United States v. Adrian Paul MartinezEighth Circuit· 1993-09-02· cited 127×
- Commonwealth v. CrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-21· cited 125×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-01-31· cited 124×
- Commonwealth v. CurninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-01-24· cited 124×
- Hadden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-02-06· cited 113×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri· 1991-07-23· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. RodgersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-02-26· cited 98×
- Polk v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-12-31· cited 93×
- State v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-08-25· cited 90×
- United States v. William Riley, Norman Burnett, Jeffrey Sizemore, Vincent MazzaSecond Circuit· 1990-06-22· cited 85×
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. FooteSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-04-20· cited 80×
- State v. PierceOhio Supreme Court· 1992-09-02· cited 78×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-05-07· cited 74×
- Springfield v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-09-21· cited 73×
- State v. WoodallWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1989-07-06· cited 72×
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-06-22· cited 70×
- Ex Parte PerrySupreme Court of Alabama· 1991-04-19· cited 69×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 2,329×
- State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court· 1987-10-07· cited 870×
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-05-28· cited 668×
- United States v. John W. DowningThird Circuit· 1985-01-25· cited 627×
- Carawan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-09-03· cited 474×
- Jent v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-12-03· cited 173×
- United States v. Isiah Williams and Michael ManningSecond Circuit· 1978-09-20· cited 141×
- Bundy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-05-09· cited 135×
- Bundy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-06-21· cited 113×
- In re LucasSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 112×
- Peek v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-01-27· cited 109×
- Correll v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-01-14· cited 104×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-12-11· cited 89×
- People v. TobeyMichigan Supreme Court· 1977-09-20· cited 87×
- People v. GonzalesMichigan Supreme Court· 1982-12-23· cited 76×
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-30· cited 76×
- Kaminski v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1953-02-24· cited 76×
- Kruse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-05· cited 66×
- People v. ReillyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-12-09· cited 61×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.