Skip to main content

Orr v. State

Citations

  • 306 S.W.3d 380
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 1196
  • 2010 WL 598730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that to warrant a mistrial, an improper question must be so clearly prejudicial that the impression it makes on the jurors cannot be withdrawn
  • stating that to warrant a mistrial, an improper question must be so clearly prejudicial that the impression it makes on the jurors cannot be withdrawn
  • stating that reviewing courts presume the jury followed the trial court’s instruction to disregard “[i]n the absence of evidence that it did not”
  • stating that reviewing courts presume the jury followed the trial court‘s instruction to disregard ―[i]n the absence of evidence that it did not‖
  • holding prosecutor’s closing argument that defendant had told her daughter to lie to the police was a reasonable deduction from the evidence when a tape was admitted in which a Texas Ranger confronted the defendant with a contradictory statement by her daughter
  • holding prosecutor’s closing argument that defendant had told her daughter to lie to the police was a reasonable deduction from the evidence when a tape was admitted in which a Texas Ranger confronted the defendant with a contradictory statement by her daughter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livingston, Dauphinot, Gardner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.