Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1/15/2003
Guevara v. State
Citations
- 97 S.W.3d 579
- 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 3
- 2003 WL 122592
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when the objection at trial fails to comport with that on appeal, the complaint is waived
- holding that appellant failed to preserve any error regarding victim-impact evidence’s admission because his objection at trial did not comport with complaint raised on appeal
- holding that appellant failed to preserve any error regarding victim-impact evidence's admission because his objection at trial did not comport with complaint raised on appeal
- holding that appellant failed to preserve any error regarding victim-impact evidence's admission because his objection at trial did not comport with complaint raised on appeal
- holding that the issue is waived when the grounds for objection asserted on appeal do not comport with those raised at trial
- holding that the issue is waived when the grounds for objection asserted on appeal do not comport with those raised at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meyers, Keller, Price, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Womack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
141 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-04-18· cited 866×
- Valtierra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-05-05· cited 747×
- Gardner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-10-21· cited 640×
- Mays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-04-28· cited 370×
- State v. WeaverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-09-28· cited 153×
- Donnie Roberts v. Rick Thaler, DirectorFifth Circuit· 2012-05-15· cited 88×
- Moreno Denoso v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2005-02-03· cited 87×
- Rowell v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2005-01-25· cited 54×
- Marc v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-06-02· cited 53×
- Jasso v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-07-31· cited 50×
- State v. AkubaSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-08-18· cited 47×
- Tovar v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-07-20· cited 47×
- Palomo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-08-18· cited 37×
- McLendon v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-07-14· cited 31×
- Simmons v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-07-01· cited 27×
- Montanez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-07-28· cited 23×
- Gutierrez v. DretkeW.D. Texas· 2005-09-27· cited 14×
- Clarke v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-08-30· cited 9×
- Watts v. QuartermanW.D. Texas· 2006-08-21· cited 2×
- Guevara v. DavisFifth Circuit· 2017-02-09· cited 2×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-24· cited 6,556×
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 2,025×
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-05-17· cited 727×
- Maxwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-04-17· cited 702×
- Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-11-13· cited 612×
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-01-29· cited 612×
- Ibarra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-10-20· cited 582×
- Reasor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-03-01· cited 484×
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-09-11· cited 282×
- Winsett v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1993-10-04· cited 146×
- Orleans Parish School Board v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1997-12-01· cited 101×
- Delgado-Cuevas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-10-02· cited 48×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.