Skip to main content
· 11/25/2003

Haoud v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 350 F.3d 201
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23993
  • 2003 WL 22776433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the Board of Immigration Appeals’ “own regulation provides more than enough ‘law’ by which a court could review the Board’s decision”
  • reaffirming that the Board of Immigration Appeals “has the duty to follow its own regulations” (quoting Nelson v. INS, 232 F.3d 258, 262 (1st Cir. 2000)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Campbell, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.