Sulaiman Tarrawally v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we are jurisdictionally barred from reviewing the IJ’s or BIA’s determination regarding extraordinary circumstances that led to delayed filing of an asylum application
• holding that an adverse credibility determination is supported by substantial evidence, even where only some of the stated bases are appropriate
• holding that country condition reports were “insufficient to demonstrate that it is more likely than not that a particular civilian, in this case [the petitioner], will be tortured” if returned to his home country
• holding that country condition reports were “insufficient to demonstrate that it is more likely than not that a particular civilian, in this case [the petitioner], will be tortured” if returned to his home country
• holding that country condition reports “alone [were] insufficient to demonstrate that it is more likely than not that a particular civilian, in this case [the petitioner], will be tortured” if returned to his home country
• holding that country condition reports “alone [were] insufficient to demonstrate that it is more likely than not that a particular civilian, in this case [the petitioner], will be tortured” if returned to his home country

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).