First Circuit· 9/15/2006

Silva v. Gonzales

Citations

463 F.3d 68
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 23462
2006 WL 2640224

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that petitioner did not exhaust his past persecution claim, explaining that the “narrow argument in his appeal to the BIA is not sufficient to allow a broader inquiry now into the IJ’s factual determination that Silva did not suffer past persecution”
holding that petitioner did not exhaust his past persecution claim, explaining that the \narrow argument in his appeal to the BIA is not sufficient to allow a broader inquiry now into the IJ's factual determination that Silva did not suffer past persecution\
finding waiver, but reaching the merits as an alternative ground for denying the petition
\We must uphold the BIA's decision 'unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.'\ (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Lynch, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Silva v. Gonzales

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.