Nreka v. United States Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the denial of relief in a VWP case equates to a final order of removal
• explaining that the denial of relief in a VWP case equates to a final order of removal
• noting that “documents to facilitate travel or gain entry into the United States cannot in and of themselves be used as the basis to deny asylum”
• finding use of fraudulent passport to obtain entry under the visa waiver program could not justify denying asylum
• “The denial of an asylum application in a VWP proceeding is so closely tied to the removal of the alien that it can be deemed. . . a final order of removal.”
• “The denial of an asylum application in a [VWP] proceeding is so closely tied to the removal of the alien that it can be deemed—in conjunction with the referral to the immigration judge—as a final order of removal, subject to [8 U.S.C.] § 1252(a)(1).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).