Cornel Viorel Scorteanu v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the BIA “need not list every possible positive and negative factor in its decision”
• stating that the BIA “need not list every possible positive and negative factor in its decision”
• rejecting argument that former, materially identical provision required notice to “the alien” as opposed to the alien’s counsel
• noting that even though the parties conceded that a statutory filing period “could be subject to equitable tolling due to ... ineffective assistance of counsel,” the court need not decide that issue because the petitioner “failed to prove entitlement to equitable relief’
• “[T]his court need not decide, in the instant case, whether the statute is subject to equitable tolling because, even if this court were to so concede, [the petitioner] has failed to prove entitlement to equitable relief.”
• “[T]his court need not decide, in the instant case, whether the statute is subject to equitable tolling because, even if this court were to so concede, [the petitioner] has failed to prove entitlement to equitable relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).