Mirdash Kambolli v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the petitioner had not established past persecution even though he was “threatened by four policemen who came to his house”
• concluding that “we lack jurisdiction to review decisions by BIA members to affirm IJ decisions without opinion”
• dismissing for lack of jurisdiction claim a petitioner's claim that a BIA member erred in unilaterally affirming an IJ's decision without opinion pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(e)(4)
• placing significant weight on the “lack of physical harm” to petitioner
• “As [petitioner] did not raise his . . . claim on appeal to the BIA, he has . . . waived [it] on appeal to this Court.”
• “[W]e lack jurisdiction to review a claim that a single BIA member erred in deciding to resolve unilaterally an appeal of an IJ’s order and not to refer the case to a three-member BIA panel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).