Skip to main content

Goolsby v. State

Citations

  • 718 S.E.2d 9
  • 311 Ga. App. 650
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 2959
  • 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 811

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no asportation when movement of victim to sofa allowed defendant to have control over her, but such control was necessary to the separate offense
  • forcing victim back a few steps to her couch insufficient evidence of asportation
  • forcing victim back a few steps to her couch insufficient evidence of asportation
  • since the defendant’s case was on direct review and not yet final when Garza was decided, it was in the pipeline so that the Garza test applied in determining whether the victim’s movement was sufficient to establish asportation
  • since the defendant’s case was on direct review and not yet final when Garza was decided, it was in the pipeline so that the Garza test applied in determining whether the victim’s movement was sufficient to establish asportation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFadden, Andrews, Phipps

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.