Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 291 Ga. 750
  • 733 S.E.2d 300
  • 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 3165
  • 2012 WL 4857204
  • 2012 Ga. LEXIS 792

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “inconsistency in the testimony of the State’s witnesses does not constitute a knowing use of perjury”
  • movement of victim from front of house to back bathroom was not insignificant, was not an inherent part of other charged of that separate offense; and (4
  • accused’s own testimony may be used to corroborate an accomplice’s testimony against him
  • movement of victim from front of house to back bathroom was not insignificant, was not an inherent part of other charged crimes and placed victim in more dangerous situation
  • movement of victim from front of house to back bathroom was not insignificant, was not an inherent part of other charged crimes and placed victim in more dangerous situation
  • accused’s own testimony may be used to corroborate an accomplice’s testimony against him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.