Skip to main content

Inman v. State

Citations

  • 294 Ga. 650
  • 755 S.E.2d 752
  • 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 392
  • 2014 WL 819433
  • 2014 Ga. LEXIS 167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • movement of victims behind a house and shed and near a wooded area increased danger to victims
  • evidence was sufficient to support conviction under Garza, where the movement was not extensive in distance or duration, but other three Garza factors were satisfied
  • evidence was sufficient to support conviction under Garza , where the movement was not extensive in distance or duration, but other three Garza factors were satisfied
  • after the State received information protected by the attorney-client privilege, there was no harm from such disclosure and disqualification of the prosecutor was not required because the State agreed not to present any of the privileged information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nahmias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.